In an excellent 2010 article published in HTS TeleogieseStudies/Theological Studies Pieter G.R. de Villiers makes the case that the "young man" who appears in Mark 14 and Mark 16 is mysteriously the same person. See "The Powerful Transformation of the Young man in Mark 14:51-52 and 16:5," HTS TeologieseStudies/Theological Studies 66(1), Art. #893, 7 pages, DOI: 10.4102/hts.v66i1.893 (November 5, 2010), online at http://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/article/view/893/1130
Mark chapter 14 ends with an anonymous "young man" who "was following Jesus" and who flees the arrest scene as he too is about to be taken by those who came for Jesus. The young man wears nothing but a linen garment which he leaves behind while fleeing from the scene. He flees naked, which is his symbol of shame and failure.
As the author of the HTS article states, "There is, however, one other reference in Mark’s Gospel, equally enigmatic, to a similar character. The climactic description of the women’s discovery of the empty tomb also refers to a young man. In Mark 16, the women go to Jesus’ tomb early on the sabbath after his death, worrying about how they will get to the body of Jesus to anoint it. They discover that the stone has been rolled away and then find a young man dressed in a white robe sitting on the right side, who tells them about the resurrection of Jesus."
The author builds the case for connecting these two appearances of a "young man," based on dress, the linen cloth in chapter 14 and the white robe in chapter 16, based on the anonymity of both of them, and on other similarities of content. Also, the place of each reference is important. The two references open and close the great story of the trial, death and resurrection of Jesus.
What does the author of the Gospel seek to teach through the two appearances of the young man? The HTS article states:
It is,
for example, clear that the passion and resurrection of Jesus brings about a
transformation in re-creation. Waaijman (2006:43"44) observes that
humanity, having made the transition from non-being into being (transformation
in creation), can orientate itself to good or to evil. Where evil prevails,
deformity follows. This happens also with the young man in the garden. Mark
makes a point of illustrating the shamefulness of his actions as he allows
others to destroy his relationship with Christ and as he betrays Jesus. His
nakedness represents the way in which his lack of faithfulness brings about his
deformation. He follows the disciples in their shameful and deformed betrayal
of Jesus. The death and resurrection of Jesus, however, brings about his transformation
in re-creation from a failed witness and his state of shame into a privileged
witness of the resurrection. He himself has no part in his re-creation. His
transformation is a divine gift to him which grants him a totally new condition
and status.
No comments:
Post a Comment